open-brainy/docs/contract-1-ratification.md

Contract 1 — ratification

Open Brainy's answer to the API contract published by the accelerated engine (docs/api-contract.md + docs/api-contract.json, contract version 1). Each item is answered with the code line that proves it, and each promise is stated as a promise rather than a description.

Internal engineering document — no frontmatter, not published.

---

1. Contract version — DECLARED

package.json carries "brainyContract": 1, and the engine states its own:

export const BRAINY_CONTRACT_VERSION = 1 as const
export function contractVersion(): number { return BRAINY_CONTRACT_VERSION }

src/utils/version.ts, re-exported from src/index.ts. Two engines can now compare an integer instead of probing prototypes, and a tool can read the package field without importing the engine. Pinned in tests/integration/filter-operator-conformance.test.ts ("declares its contract version in code and in package.json") — the code value and the package field can never drift apart silently.

---

2. The REQUIRED / OPTIONAL split — RATIFIED, WITH A COMMITMENT

Ratified: 41 required doors of 57. The promise, stated plainly:

A REQUIRED door is never removed, never narrowed, and never made optional without a MAJOR contract bump. "Narrowed" includes: refusing an input it used to accept, returning less than it used to return, and changing an ordering, a cursor encoding, or a refusal's typed code. An OPTIONAL door may be added in a minor; an optional door promoted to required is a major, because a consumer that relied on feature-detecting it now has a hard dependency.

Two clarifications this engine attaches, so the promise means the same thing on both sides:

1. A refusal is part of the door. Contract 1 includes not only that find({ where }) answers, but that it REFUSES by name for the operators listed as refused. Turning a refusal into a silent empty answer is a narrowing, not a relaxation — the same class of change as removing the door.
2. Deprecation is not removal. This engine may mark a required door deprecated in a minor (documented, warned) as long as it keeps working. Only its removal is a major.

---

3. is / isNot / greaterEqual / lessEqual — A FINDING AGAINST THE SPEC

The specification is wrong about these four, and this engine has never served them. docs/filter-operator-conformance.md (in the accelerated engine's repository — not editable from here) lists them as served aliases. The accepted set is defined in one place:

// src/utils/metadataFilter.ts
const VALUE_OPERATORS = new Set<string>([
  'equals', 'eq', 'notEquals', 'ne',
  'greaterThan', 'gt', 'greaterThanOrEqual', 'gte',
  'lessThan', 'lt', 'lessThanOrEqual', 'lte',
  'between', 'oneOf', 'in', 'noneOf',
  'contains', 'excludes', 'hasAll', 'length',
  'exists', 'missing', 'matches', 'startsWith', 'endsWith'
])

25 tokens. None of the four appears; validateWhereFilter() raises BrainyError('INVALID_QUERY') naming the bad operator and listing the valid set, before any index read. A consumer following the spec would have written a filter this engine rejects outright.

Action taken here, since the prose lives in the other repository: the truth is made machine-checkable rather than re-asserted in another document. The accepted set is asserted token-for-token in tests/integration/filter-operator-conformance.test.ts, read out of the engine's own refusal message, and the same set is emitted into docs/api-contract.json (item 8). Diff the manifests; the prose can then be corrected from a fact.

---

4. The serving-withholding invariant list — CONFIRMED IDENTICAL

index-initialized · durable-state-present · manifest-residency · replay-clean · strand-latch. Confirmed as this engine's list, and confirmed EXHAUSTIVE for contract 1: these are the only invariants whose failure may withhold serving. Everything else a health report can fail is a warn — it names damage without closing a door.

The mechanism on this side: assessProviderHealth() (src/utils/indexReadiness.ts) treats the provider's own serving verdict as authoritative and verbatim; an UNLEDGERED family never flips a serving provider to not-ready and never flips a not-serving provider to ready. The read gate refuses PER FAMILY — a metadata read is never refused by an unserving vector leg (src/brainy.ts, ensureFamiliesServing).

One addition this engine is making, declared here because it changes what a refusal MEANS: a provider may now report rebuildInProgress() — it is rebuilding ITSELF, online, and its doors refuse by name with progress until it is whole. This does not add a withholding invariant (the provider's own serving: false is still what withholds); it adds a REASON attached to that withholding, so a caller can tell "temporarily closed, opens by itself" from "broken, needs repairIndex()". Additive, hence a minor.

---

5. The compatibility rule — ADOPTED

Minor = additive. Major = breaking. Adopted verbatim, with the announcement duty attached:

Every public-surface addition is announced. The accelerated engine's package re-exports this engine's surface by enumeration, so it goes red on any new export BY DESIGN — that redness is the announcement mechanism working, not a build break to route around.

The mechanics that make this checkable rather than remembered: scripts/emit-contract-manifest.mjs --check fails when the committed docs/api-contract.json no longer matches the built surface. A new export is therefore a red check with a message naming what to do: re-emit and announce.

---

6. The 30 storage seam methods — SUPPORTED SURFACE, COMMITTED

Committed: every method in docs/api-contract.md §15 is supported surface until Stage 2, and none is removed without a contract major. They are the seam the accelerated engine's storage adapter implements and the seam its reader replaces piece by piece; removing one mid-programme would break a working pair for no gain.

Two qualifications, both stated so neither side is surprised:

1. Supported ≠ frozen in behaviour. A seam method may become FASTER, may narrate more, and may start refusing an input that was previously an undefined-behaviour footgun — the last of those is announced as a divergence here before it ships, not discovered by the other engine.
2. counts.json's ledger is the one seam value that is not an enumeration. See docs/canonical-layout-ratification.md §8: only the all-tier pair carrying allCountsDerivedBy: 'identity-record' with allCountsSuspect: false may be subtracted against. That rule is part of this commitment.

---

7. hasAll / noneOf / excludes — SERVED, NOT RATIFIED AS A DIVERGENCE

The accelerated engine was right that it was the correct side, and the divergence is now closed in the right direction: this engine serves all three on the index path.

The defect underneath was worse than a divergence. The metadata index's operator switch (src/utils/metadataIndex.ts) had no default case, so any operator without a case left the field's match set at its initial [] and find() returned an empty page. hasAll, noneOf and excludes are documented, accepted by the validator, and implemented in the in-memory matcher — and they answered silently wrong through an index-backed find.

• hasAll: [a, b] — the intersection of each element's posting set. An empty operand array is vacuously true of every row that HAS the field.
• noneOf: [a, b] — the complement of the union of their posting sets.
• excludes: v — the complement of contains.

And the other four are now REFUSED BY NAME rather than answered empty. startsWith, endsWith, matches and length cannot be evaluated by an equality/range posting index without reading every row, which is the cost this path exists to avoid. They raise BrainyError('INVALID_QUERY') naming the operator, the field, and the reason. This matches the accelerated engine's behaviour for the same four tokens, so the two engines now AGREE on all 25:

class	tokens
served on the index path	between, contains, eq, equals, excludes, exists, greaterThan, greaterThanOrEqual, gt, gte, hasAll, in, lessThan, lessThanOrEqual, lt, lte, missing, ne, noneOf, notEquals, oneOf
refused by name	endsWith, length, matches, startsWith

Pinned in tests/integration/filter-operator-conformance.test.ts: the exact 25-token accepted set, the three now served with their real answers (including an honest zero), and each of the four refusing by name.

This is a behaviour change for any consumer today calling the four refused operators through find({ where }). They received an empty page; they now receive a typed refusal. Converting a wrong answer into a loud refusal is this engine's own law, and the previous behaviour was not a contract anyone could have relied on deliberately — but it is a change, and it is named here rather than discovered.

knownDivergences after this change: the entry served-beyond-baseline is RESOLVED (both engines serve all three). The entry refused-operators-answer-differently is RESOLVED (both engines refuse the same four by name). Contract 1 has no remaining operator divergence.

---

8. This engine's own manifest — EMITTED

docs/api-contract.json, generated by scripts/emit-contract-manifest.mjs from the BUILT surface: the prototype's own methods and accessors, the exported error classes, the operator sets read out of their single definitions, the field-addressing vocabulary read out of src/db/fieldAddressing.ts, and the health verdicts. Nothing in it is hand-maintained, so a diff between the two manifests is a diff between two engines rather than between two authors.

node scripts/emit-contract-manifest.mjs --check fails when the committed manifest is stale — the announcement duty of item 5, made mechanical.

What the manifest deliberately does NOT carry: requirement marking. Whether a door is required is a commitment, not a property of the surface; it is item 2 of this document. The diff the two sides want — "does Open Brainy still expose every door contract 1 requires?" — is a set-membership check between their doors[].name where requirement === 'required' and this manifest's doors[].name.

---

Summary of what changed in code for this ratification

item	change
1	"brainyContract": 1 in package.json; contractVersion() / BRAINY_CONTRACT_VERSION exported
3	the accepted 25-token set asserted from the engine's own refusal message, and emitted into the manifest
7	hasAll / noneOf / excludes served on the index path; startsWith / endsWith / matches / length refused by name instead of answered empty
8	scripts/emit-contract-manifest.mjs + the generated docs/api-contract.json, with a --check mode