# Brainy Performance Analysis & Optimization

## Current Issues Found

### 1. ❌ CRITICAL: notEquals Operator is O(n)
```javascript
// PROBLEM: Gets ALL items to filter
case 'notEquals':
  const allItemIds = await this.getAllIds() // O(n) - TERRIBLE!
```

### 2. ❌ Soft Delete Performance
- Every query adds `deleted: { notEquals: true }` 
- This makes EVERY query O(n) instead of O(log n)

### 3. ❌ exists Operator is Inefficient
```javascript
case 'exists':
  // Scans all cache entries - O(n)
  for (const [key, entry] of this.indexCache.entries()) {
    if (entry.field === field) {
      entry.ids.forEach(id => allIds.add(id))
    }
  }
```

### 4. ⚠️ Query Optimizer Not Smart Enough
- `isSelectiveFilter()` needs to understand which filters are fast
- Should prioritize O(1) and O(log n) operations

## Performance Characteristics

### ✅ Fast Operations (Keep These)
| Operation | Complexity | Example |
|-----------|-----------|---------|
| Vector Search (HNSW) | O(log n) | `like: "query"` |
| Exact Match | O(1) | `where: { status: "active" }` |
| Deleted Filter (NEW) | O(1) | `where: { deleted: false }` |
| Range Query (sorted) | O(log n) | `where: { year: { gt: 2000 } }` |
| Graph Traversal | O(k) | `connected: { from: id }` |

### ❌ Slow Operations (Need Fixing)
| Operation | Current | Should Be | Fix |
|-----------|---------|-----------|-----|
| notEquals | O(n) | O(1) or O(log n) | Use complement index |
| exists | O(n) | O(1) | Maintain field existence bitmap |
| noneOf | O(n) | O(k) | Use set operations |

## Optimized Architecture

### Solution 1: Positive Indexing for Soft Delete ✅
```javascript
// Instead of: deleted !== true (O(n))
// Use: deleted === false (O(1))
where: { deleted: false }

// Ensure all items have deleted field
if (!metadata.deleted) metadata.deleted = false
```

### Solution 2: Complement Indices for notEquals
```javascript
class MetadataIndexManager {
  // For common notEquals queries, maintain complement sets
  private complementIndices: Map<string, Set<string>> = new Map()
  
  // Example: Track non-deleted items separately
  private activeItems: Set<string> = new Set()
  private deletedItems: Set<string> = new Set()
}
```

### Solution 3: Field Existence Bitmap
```javascript
class FieldExistenceIndex {
  private fieldBitmaps: Map<string, BitSet> = new Map()
  
  hasField(id: string, field: string): boolean {
    return this.fieldBitmaps.get(field)?.has(id) ?? false
  }
}
```

## Query Execution Strategy

### Progressive Search (When Metadata is Selective)
```
1. Field Filter (O(1) or O(log n)) → Small candidate set
2. Vector Search within candidates (O(k log k))
3. Fusion if needed
```

### Parallel Search (When Nothing is Selective)
```
1. Vector Search (O(log n)) → Top K results
2. Graph Traversal (O(m)) → Connected items  
3. Field Filter (O(1)) → Metadata matches
4. Fusion: Intersection or Union
```

## Implementation Priority

1. **DONE** ✅ Fix soft delete to use `deleted: false`
2. **TODO** 🔧 Optimize notEquals for common fields
3. **TODO** 🔧 Add field existence index
4. **TODO** 🔧 Improve query optimizer intelligence
5. **TODO** 🔧 Add query explain mode for debugging

## Performance Targets

- Vector search: < 10ms for 1M items
- Metadata filter: < 1ms for exact match
- Combined query: < 20ms for complex queries
- Soft delete overhead: < 0.1ms (O(1))