N concurrent update({ ifRev }) calls carrying the same expected revision all
fulfilled (zero RevisionConflictErrors, last-writer-wins) — the check ran
before the commit mutex, so interleaved callers all passed it before any apply
landed. Sequential calls conflicted correctly, which hid the race. A production
cutover rehearsal caught it: 8 parallel ifRev-guarded ledger writes all
"succeeded" and 7 were silently lost. Advisory locks built on exactly-one-winner
semantics could hand the same lock to two workers.
Fix: conditional commit. commitSingleOp and commitTransaction accept an
optional precommit(beforeImages) precondition, invoked under the commit mutex
against the just-read authoritative before-images and before anything is staged
or applied — the per-record analogue of ifAtGeneration, which always ran there.
A throw aborts the commit atomically (generation reservation returned, zero
staging I/O in the transaction path). The store stays domain-ignorant; update()
and transact() supply the ifRev predicate:
- update(): the planning-time check remains as a fast-fail (avoids embedding
cost on an obviously stale expectation); the authoritative check re-verifies
the before-image's _rev and re-stamps the update's _rev from it, so the
counter is monotonic even for concurrent non-CAS updates (N plain updates
advance _rev by N). CAS against a concurrently-removed entity now throws
EntityNotFoundError instead of silently resurrecting it; plain updates keep
their last-writer-wins re-create semantics.
- transact(): per-op ifRev expectations registered during planning
(PlannedTransact.casUpdates) are re-verified in the batch's precommit; any
conflict rejects the whole batch before staging. Multiple updates to one
entity sequence through a running rev; ids the batch itself adds
(PlannedTransact.createdNouns — add resets the rev baseline even on
overwrite) keep their exact plan-time sequencing.
Regression suite (tests/integration/ifrev-concurrent-cas.test.ts): 8 parallel
same-rev updates → exactly 1 winner + 7 conflicts; same for transact batches;
_rev monotonicity; the documented read→CAS→retry ledger loop converging exactly
(8 workers, 8 decrements, 0 lost); sequential behavior unchanged; forward-ref
add+update in one batch unchanged.
