docs(8.0): correct public docs to the real 8.0 API + honest perf claims

The GA-readiness audit found the public docs had drifted from the shipped
surface and presented uncited performance numbers as measured fact.

- quick-start: `FindResult`→`Result`, `VerbType.BuiltOn`→`DependsOn` (the
  canonical getting-started example now compiles).
- noun-verb-taxonomy: rewrote every sample off removed/fictional APIs
  (`augment`/`connectModel`/`getVerbs`/two-arg `add`/`like`/`$gte`) onto the
  real single-object `add`/`find`/`relate`/`related`; replaced the stale
  31-noun/40-verb catalogs with accurate, complete tables (42 nouns, 127 verbs).
- triple-intelligence: `like:`→`query:`, dollar-operators→bare operators, and
  several other fictional keys swept to the real `FindParams`.
- FIND_SYSTEM / PERFORMANCE / index-architecture / BATCHING: replaced
  fabricated, mutually-inconsistent latency tables and uncited speedup
  multipliers with Big-O characterizations, qualitative mechanism descriptions,
  and the one genuinely-measured benchmark (graph O(1) neighbor lookup), per the
  evidence-based-claims rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Snelling 2026-06-29 10:03:02 -07:00
parent 3d116190f3
commit 40d2cd5419
9 changed files with 1209 additions and 2283 deletions

View file

@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
## Performance Characteristics
Brainy achieves industry-leading performance through carefully optimized data structures and algorithms. All performance claims are verified through actual benchmarks on production code.
Brainy achieves high performance through carefully optimized data structures and algorithms. The tables below describe each component by its **algorithmic complexity** — the durable, defensible guarantee. The example latencies are figures from a single 100-item run on one machine (see [Benchmarks](#benchmarks)); they are illustrative, not a committed benchmark, and vary with hardware, embedding model, and storage backend. The one component with a committed scale assertion is the graph adjacency index (`tests/performance/graph-scale-performance.test.ts:238`).
### Core Performance Summary
| Component | Operation | Time Complexity | Measured Performance | Data Structure |
| Component | Operation | Time Complexity | Example latency (100-item run)\* | Data Structure |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|---------------------|----------------|
| **Metadata Index** | Exact match | **O(1)** | 0.8ms | `Map<string, Set<string>>` |
| **Metadata Index** | Range query | **O(log n) + O(k)** | 0.6ms | Sorted array + binary search |
@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ Brainy achieves industry-leading performance through carefully optimized data st
| **Type Detection** | Noun/Verb matching | **O(t)** | 0.3ms | Pre-embedded type vectors |
| **Triple Intelligence** | Combined query | **O(1) to O(log n)** | 1.8ms | Parallel execution |
\* Illustrative single-run figures at 100 items on one machine — not a committed benchmark. Only the graph index carries an asserted scale bound (measured <1 ms per neighbor lookup up to 1M relationships, `tests/performance/graph-scale-performance.test.ts:238`).
Where:
- `n` = number of items in index
- `k` = number of results returned
@ -26,25 +28,32 @@ Where:
### brain.get() Metadata-Only Optimization
**Massive Performance Improvement**: `brain.get()` is now **76-81% faster** by default!
`brain.get()` returns **metadata only by default**, skipping the 384-dimensional
embedding — the bulk of an entity's payload. Callers that need the vector opt in
with `{ includeVectors: true }`.
| Operation | Before | After | Speedup | Use Case |
|-----------|------------------|-----------------|---------|----------|
| **brain.get() (metadata-only)** | 43ms, 6KB | **10ms, 300 bytes** | **76-81%** | VFS, existence checks, metadata |
| **brain.get({ includeVectors: true })** | 43ms, 6KB | 43ms, 6KB | 0% | Similarity calculations |
| **VFS readFile()** | 53ms | **~13ms** | **75%** | File operations |
| **VFS readdir(100 files)** | 5.3s | **~1.3s** | **75%** | Directory listings |
| Operation | Default (metadata-only) | With `includeVectors: true` | Use Case |
|-----------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|----------|
| **brain.get()** | Skips vector load | Loads full vector | VFS, existence checks, metadata |
| **VFS readFile() / readdir()** | Inherits metadata-only path | n/a | File operations, directory listings |
**Key Innovation**: Lazy vector loading - only load 384-dimensional embeddings when explicitly needed.
**Key Innovation**: Lazy vector loading — only load the 384-dimensional embedding when explicitly needed.
The integration test `tests/integration/metadata-only-comprehensive.test.ts:306`
asserts metadata-only `get()` is faster than the full-entity `get()`
(`metadataTime < fullTime`). The *magnitude* of the speedup is
environment-dependent (the percentage assertion in
`tests/integration/vfs-performance-v5.11.1.test.ts` is intentionally skipped on
CI for that reason), so no fixed percentage is quoted here.
**Why this matters**:
- **94% of brain.get() calls** don't need vectors (VFS, admin tools, import utilities, data APIs)
- **Vector data is 95% of entity size** (6KB vectors vs 300 bytes metadata)
- **Zero code changes** for most applications - automatic speedup!
- Most `brain.get()` calls don't need vectors (VFS, admin tools, import utilities, data APIs)
- The embedding dominates an entity's serialized size, so skipping it is the largest win
- **Zero code changes** for most applications — automatic by default
**When to use what**:
```typescript
// DEFAULT: Metadata-only (76-81% faster) - use for:
// DEFAULT: Metadata-only (skips the vector load) - use for:
const entity = await brain.get(id)
// - VFS operations (readFile, stat, readdir)
// - Existence checks: if (await brain.get(id)) ...
@ -252,28 +261,34 @@ const results = await Promise.all(searchPromises)
## Benchmarks
### Real-world Performance Test (100 items)
### Illustrative Single Run (100 items, one machine)
Example output from a single 100-item run — illustrative only, not a committed
benchmark; absolute numbers vary by hardware. The values feed the
[Core Performance Summary](#core-performance-summary) example-latency column.
```
📊 Metadata exact match: 0.818ms (50 items matched)
📊 Metadata range query: 0.631ms (40 items in range)
🔗 Graph neighbor lookup: 0.092ms (2 connections)
🎯 Vector k-NN search: 1.773ms (10 nearest neighbors)
🧠 NLP query parsing: 8.906ms (full natural language)
Triple Intelligence: 1.830ms (combined query)
Metadata exact match: 0.818ms (50 items matched)
Metadata range query: 0.631ms (40 items in range)
Graph neighbor lookup: 0.092ms (2 connections)
Vector k-NN search: 1.773ms (10 nearest neighbors)
NLP query parsing: 8.906ms (full natural language)
Triple Intelligence: 1.830ms (combined query)
```
### Scaling Characteristics
| Items | Metadata O(1) | Range O(log n) | Graph O(1) | Vector O(log n) |
|-------|---------------|----------------|------------|-----------------|
| 100 | 0.8ms | 0.6ms | 0.09ms | 1.8ms |
| 1,000 | 0.8ms | 0.9ms | 0.09ms | 2.5ms |
| 10,000 | 0.8ms | 1.2ms | 0.09ms | 3.2ms |
| 100,000 | 0.8ms | 1.5ms | 0.09ms | 4.1ms |
| 1,000,000 | 0.8ms | 1.8ms | 0.09ms | 5.0ms |
Each stage scales by its algorithmic complexity, not a fixed millisecond figure
— absolute latency depends on hardware, embedding model, and storage backend.
Only the graph adjacency index carries a committed scale assertion:
*Note: O(1) operations maintain constant time regardless of scale*
| Query stage | Complexity | Scaling behavior |
|-------------|------------|------------------|
| Metadata filter (exact) | O(1) | Constant — independent of dataset size |
| Metadata filter (range) | O(log n) + O(k) | Sub-linear; k = matching results |
| Vector search (HNSW) | O(log n) | Degrades gracefully via hierarchical layers |
| Graph hop | O(1) | Measured <1 ms per neighbor lookup, validated up to 1M relationships (`tests/performance/graph-scale-performance.test.ts:238`) |
| Combined query | O(log n) | Bounded by the vector stage; metadata and graph stages stay O(1)/O(log n) |
## Comparison with Other Systems
@ -470,8 +485,8 @@ For off-site replication, snapshot `path` from your scheduler (`gsutil rsync`, `
- **Auto-configuration system** with environment detection
- **Zero-config operation** with intelligent defaults
- **Auto-flush and auto-optimize** in indices
- **Sub-2ms response times** for complex queries
- **Low-latency Triple Intelligence queries** (O(log n) vector + O(1) metadata/graph)
## Conclusion
Brainy delivers on its promise of **production-ready Triple Intelligence** with measured, verified performance characteristics. All listed features are fully implemented, tested, and benchmarked. No stubs, no mocks, no theoretical claims - just real, working code with measured performance.
Brainy delivers on its promise of **production-ready Triple Intelligence** with documented algorithmic-complexity guarantees and a committed graph-scale benchmark (`tests/performance/graph-scale-performance.test.ts`). All listed features are fully implemented and tested. No stubs, no mocks — just real, working code with characterized performance.